Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
1.
PLoS Comput Biol ; 17(6): e1009056, 2021 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1282290

ABSTRACT

In October of 2020, in response to the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, our team hosted our first fully online workshop teaching the QIIME 2 microbiome bioinformatics platform. We had 75 enrolled participants who joined from at least 25 different countries on 6 continents, and we had 22 instructors on 4 continents. In the 5-day workshop, participants worked hands-on with a cloud-based shared compute cluster that we deployed for this course. The event was well received, and participants provided feedback and suggestions in a postworkshop questionnaire. In January of 2021, we followed this workshop with a second fully online workshop, incorporating lessons from the first. Here, we present details on the technology and protocols that we used to run these workshops, focusing on the first workshop and then introducing changes made for the second workshop. We discuss what worked well, what didn't work well, and what we plan to do differently in future workshops.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Computational Biology , Microbiota , Computational Biology/education , Computational Biology/organization & administration , Feedback , Humans , SARS-CoV-2
2.
Biotechniques ; 70(3): 149-159, 2021 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1054921

ABSTRACT

One goal of microbial ecology researchers is to capture the maximum amount of information from all organisms in a sample. The recent COVID-19 pandemic, caused by the RNA virus SARS-CoV-2, has highlighted a gap in traditional DNA-based protocols, including the high-throughput methods the authors previously established as field standards. To enable simultaneous SARS-CoV-2 and microbial community profiling, the authors compared the relative performance of two total nucleic acid extraction protocols with the authors' previously benchmarked protocol. The authors included a diverse panel of environmental and host-associated sample types, including body sites commonly swabbed for COVID-19 testing. Here the authors present results comparing the cost, processing time, DNA and RNA yield, microbial community composition, limit of detection and well-to-well contamination between these protocols.


Subject(s)
DNA, Viral/isolation & purification , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing/methods , Microbiota/genetics , RNA, Ribosomal, 16S/isolation & purification , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , Animals , Biodiversity , Cats , Chemical Fractionation/methods , Feces/microbiology , Feces/virology , Female , Fermented Foods/microbiology , Humans , Limit of Detection , Male , Metagenomics/methods , Mice , Saliva/microbiology , Saliva/virology , Skin/microbiology , Skin/virology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL